Argyle aquaculture critics say legal review does not address all of their concerns
The group that pressed the Municipality of Argyle with 16 conflict of interest allegations does not think the recent legal report means the Municipality fulfilled their obligations to the public.
The Association for Responsible Aquaculture in Argyle (ARA) has been in conflict with the Municipality after they created 53-pre approved aquaculture sites as a way to take away red tape for harvesters and pave the way for more industry in the area.
Pushback from residents sparked public conversation and additional consultation, but many felt it wasn’t enough.
ARA spokesperson Chris Thibedeau told Acadia News in a previous interview that he isn’t opposed to aquaculture, but that there needs to be a balance to not affect tourism and other industries.
“They’re just trying to steamroll this forward, and not listening to anybody,” said Thibedeau. “There’s a real concern for everybody, because we weren’t part of the original process.”
The group later levied 16 conflict of interest allegations against the Municipality, including providing insider access, discouraging public consultation and fabricating data.
In June, a Nova Scotia Ombudsman found that the Municipality of Argyle “fulfilled or exceeded its duty to consult the public.
The ARA argued the scope of that investigation, claiming that the Ombudsman failed to acknowledge any of the conflict of interest allegations, and that the findings “confirm longstanding concerns about structural gaps” in the municipal process.
Now, the ARA have published their statement following the legal report that says the group did not provide enough evidence to support their claims.
They say although the legal review concluded their allegations did not meet the threshold for asking the province to begin a formal inquiry, that doesn’t mean how the Municipality handled the process was ok.
The ARA argues that some of their concerns, like big-rigging, went unreviewed as they were outside the scope of the report.
Now they’re asking the council to review staff conduct and put its engagement commitments on a published timetable for community members to see.
They’re asking for a written reply from the council by October 23.

